Wikipedia is a US Gov't Fraud -
How US Agents Can Embed in Wikipedia, Plant Propaganda,
Delete Facts, Deceive and Attack Citizens - Wikipedia and
the CIA
Now Proven by Research on Wired News! - see just below
This article by Dr Les Sachs (Dr Leslie Sachs) was
originally published on the "Banned in America" weblog, and on other
locations on the internet, on 15 April 2006. Recently this was yet another article
banned by US illegal court orders against Google that were requested by
President Bush's friend, the racist and terrorist author Patricia Cornwell.
These allegations about Wikpedia as a tool of CIA and US
criminal corporations, announced long ago to the world by Dr Sachs, are now
even more fully PROVEN by new large-scale research announced by Wired News, and
also on Alex Jones' Prison Planet website.
For the article, "Credibility Of Wikipedia Takes a Dive
. . .Online encyclopedia outed as bias tool of intelligence agencies,
corporations," by Paul Joseph Watson on Alex Jones' Prison Planet website,
click here.
For the article "See Who's Editing Wikipedia" by
John Borland on Wired News, click here.
(See also the article about Bush's friend: Patricia Cornwell
using Wikipedia & Answers.com as base to deceive media, plant false
information to cover Cornwell felony crimes & sleaze)
Wikipedia An Ultimate
Trojan Horse for CIA and US Government on the Internet -
Fake Wikipedia Biography of Bush Donor Patricia Cornwell
Absurd Wikipedia "Budget" - the Giveaway of
CIA-NSA Funding?
Staffers of the Wikipedia online "encyclopedia" -
now one of the most dominant media websites in the entire world - show signs of
being CIA-type operatives, directly engaged in US-funded propaganda operations
against US and world citizens.
This has significance far beyond the particular instance
here of false statements and propaganda, that have been maintained on Wikipedia
in order to cover for a wealthy donor to the President George Bush family, to
try to sabotage American legal reform and to attack a critic of the US empire.
What we are facing, is that Wikipedia may already be the
ultimate Trojan horse of US government propaganda and intelligence operations.
Via this one overwhelmingly dominant website, the thousands of nameless agents
at CIA and NSA headquarters, can now deceive and defraud millions of US
citizens and much of the rest of the world as well.
These agents can smear and attack those who challenge the
government; they can easily launch lies and propaganda on this powerful web
forum that can falsify anything, and undermine almost anyone.
To give you a quick proof of how fake Wikipedia is, let's
consider the case of major Bush donor and weird right-wing celebrity author
Patricia Cornwell. Cornwell is an old pal of the Bushes since the early 1980s.
Take a look on the web for the well-documented
"Patricia Cornwell Biography: Her Crimes, Bribery, Scandals and Mental
Illness". Here you find a pretty juicy set of legal cases and scandals
collected from court documents and print media like Esquire and Vanity Fair.
Then take a look at the totally fake biography of Bush's
friend Cornwell on Wikipedia - Here, most of the facts of Cornwell's
fascinating life are not even mentioned, and a good chunk of the Wikipedia
entry makes a slanderous attack on the author who wrote Cornwell's real
biography above.
At the time this article was originally written, the
Wikipedia attack on the biographer used a fake "internet source" for
a phony story about a court case, not telling you that this deceptive Wikipedia
"source article" is from a dishonest law professor, Roy Girasa,
working for Cornwell's own publisher, Pearson plc Penguin Books, who is a party
in the legal case being described.
The American CIA and intelligence guys are very interested
in Bush's friend Cornwell, and not because they like her books (which federal
judge Robert Payne once colourfully described as "a load of crap").
The CIA guys want to hide the truth about Cornwell, and to smear any critics,
because the things Cornwell has done with US judges, are a scandal with the
potential to rock the US government to its foundations. The Cornwell entry has
become a good example of how Wikipedia has become a US government propaganda
mechanism.
Despite all the lies and fraud on Wikipedia, this bogus
online "encyclopedia" is today the most dominant reference source in
the English speaking world. It is far more influential than many people realize
or imagine, thanks to the power of the internet.
Wikipedia is based in
Florida, where President Bush's brother Jeb has been Governor, and where the
Bushes managed that nice little game in 2000 that led to America's judges
making G. W. Bush the President, even though the other guy won the election.
The rise and growth of Wikipedia is simultaneous with the current Bush regime.
Here's another quick way to give you an idea what is going
on. Think of some country you know very little about. Punch up the name on an
internet search engine. Two things will tend to pop up quite high on the list:
"Wikipedia" and the "CIA Fact Book". Hmm. Are you starting
to feel the connections here?
By its own boasting, Wikipedia is one of the most consulted
websites on the planet. But the content of Wikipedia - and any lies or fraud or
propaganda in that content - are multiplied many times over, because Wikipedia
in turn becomes the source for millions of other web viewings under many other
names, under all a number of Wikipedia licence agreements or other kinds of
borrowing.
Particularly important is the US-Israeli Answers.com site,
which copies, multiplies and magnifies whatever lies are in Wikipedia content.
The CIA loves it - all that free slander and propaganda, multiplied over and
over. Answers.com - based in Jerusalem
and New York - does not even try to deny that it is servicing the US and
Israeli intelligence agencies.
So when you do an internet search, often what you find among
your "Top 10" search results, are several results from Wikipedia, and
then several results from Answers.com (which basically repeat Wikipedia). Most
people will never get beyond these entries, and thus the US intelligence and
propaganda agencies already control what many people read on the internet.
In this particular case of Patricia Cornwell, someone who
acts like a CIA-backed operative is one "W. Guy Finley", who operates
on Wikipedia as one of the central Wikipedia "Advocates", or
Wikipedia pseudo-lawyers - the people who are supposed to help you, when someone
else is publishing false things about you.
These "Wikipedia lawyers" in that strange little
Wikipedia world, turn out to be as nasty, devious and malicious as other
lawyers in the US who serve the corporations and the US government.
W. Guy Finley is one of two leading Wikipedia
administrators, along with British Wikipedia spokesman David Gerard, who have
e-mailed their hatred and abuse to Dr Les Sachs for daring to criticise
Wikipedia and expose its fraud and service to the US regime. Finley and Gerard
both express their deep hatred, and their wish to do harm to Dr Les Sachs, and
they have the powerful Wikipedia tool in their hands to help slander and attack
him.
These "Wikipedia advocates", like everybody else
on Wikipedia, kiss up to the rich and the powerful corporate criminals and US
government, who are ultimately served by the fraudulent Bush-backed Wikipedia.
The fake Wikipedia "democracy"
Much like the United
States itself, Wikipedia pretends to be a "democracy". They proudly
trumpet: "Anyone can edit Wikipedia!" And something like that
happens, but it is an illusion. You can likely right now jump onto the
computer, go to the Patricia Cornwell page, and put in a few real facts about
the life of Bush's friend Patricia Cornwell, and delete some of the lies put
there by Cornwell's staff or the CIA guys.
But then - you know what happens a little later? Cornwell's
staff members (she has over 125 million dollars, she can afford them) or the
CIA guys, quickly delete your material and put things back the way they were, unless
you said something really ass-kissy that they like and want to keep.
Much like America itself, the fake "Wikipedia"
democracy, turns out to be rule by the rich and the strong and the devious.
Some of it is sheer manpower - Other things being equal, Wikipedia articles
tend to be controlled by those who have the time and staff to maintain the
pages the way they want.
And no one has more staff available, than wealthy political
criminals, or the several US intelligence agencies, with their multi-billion
dollar propaganda budget, who can afford to have thousands of employees at
secret, anonymous locations, trolling Wikipedia to keep things up the way the
government wants.
When the US
intelligence agencies, and a wealthy political criminal like Patricia Cornwell
are working together, they exercise a complete Nazi-like control over
Wikipedia.
How are conflicts handled on Wikipedia, when several people
keep editing a page, when it's you in conflict with the CIA guys? It's a
complex question of procedure combined with bullying. Wikipedia works like a
cult. There are lots of bizarre little rules or "Wikiquette", some of
them self-contradictory. Only the remote Lords of Wikipedia are really masters
of the system, and this is all to benefit the rich and powerful and the US
government.
There are various conflict-resolution procedures, and there
are sets and hierarchies of Wikipedia "administrators" and
"volunteers" who often hide behind screen names. It is an extremely
hidden process, and they make it very difficult to contact the leaders, or to
find out how the place works or what is going on. People involved in Wikipedia
are a mixture, partly of some naive volunteers and eager beavers, who don't
realize they're part of a very sleazy government operation, and a likely quite
large coterie of operatives at intelligence agencies like the CIA and NSA, who
may be the truly powerful "Wikipedia volunteers", working with the
corporate criminal hirelings such as work for Patricia Cornwell.
Does this mean that
most of Wikipedia is written by the government, or supervised by it? No, not at
all. A lot of Wikipedia, most of it in fact, the CIA guys don't care about. For
articles about pottery in 7th century France, or ancient geology in the time of
the dinosaurs, the Lords of Wikipedia are perfectly happy to let college
professors, hobbyists or just plain average people put up material and bicker
about it. The vast majority of Wikipedia content falls into this category.
Indeed, it was part of the genius of Wikipedia that they
could enroll millions of people in helping to create this CIA-backed vehicle.
It is much more powerful and legitimate-seeming, if people get used to looking
things up on Wikipedia, if they go there to read helpful things about Beethoven
or Tibetan rugs. The somewhat legitimate content, makes it much easier to sell
the propaganda placed there in specific CIA-backed cases, like with Bush's
friend and donor Patricia Cornwell.
Wikipedia's power also derives from the short attention span
and laziness of the average person. To get an impression of something or
someone, people jump on the internet and google or search. Then, for their
quick initial view of a person or topic, they often jump onto Wikipedia. If
Wikipedia smears someone, that person is pretty well smeared, factual or not,
and people usually will not investigate any further.
Wikipedia is also the
direct tool for controlling the world's corporate media employees - the
so-called "journalists" - who base their articles now, largely on
what they themselves read on Wikipedia, and then they pompously intone,
"According to Wikipedia . . . ", as if it were somehow very clever of
these "journalists" to consult Wikipedia at the top of their
Google-search.
Journalists instinctively feel, that Wikipedia is the tool
of the US government and the big corporations, and thus that they can follow
Wikipedia whenever a Wikipedia article is supporting the US-corporate
establishment.
The journalists then
publish shoddy, corrupt and outright false "news articles", which are
based on Wikipedia as a source, and then Wikipedia can then use these
"major news media" articles as new "authentic sources" for
Wikipedia. It is a perfect circle of propaganda corruption, managed by the US
intelligence agencies. Wikipedia is the dream of Nazi propaganda minister
Joseph Goebbels come true. - Worldwide control of what people read and think,
via one website under US government control.
For more about this kind of Wikipedia-and-news-media
propaganda circle of propaganda and lies in a specific case, see the article
Patricia Cornwell using Wikipedia & Answers.com as base to deceive media,
plant false information to cover Cornwell felony crimes & sleaze.
Fake "Moderation" and "Neutrality"
Wikipedia gives way to a feigned moderation in cases of
accepted public "controversy", like with articles about President
Ronald Reagan or President Bill Clinton. Such famous people have
"differing views" written about them in the major media, and lots of
people try to add material. So the Lords of Wikipedia move the page to a sort
of "neutral compromise" of "well established" material.
It's not that you get the real truth, of course. What you get is a neutral
mish-mash of facts as allowed by the major corporate media. Not too bad perhaps,
but often not very illuminating, either.
If criminals are being publicly charged and indicted, if the
corporate media has made a big story over the indicted executives of Enron, or
some lobbyist facing federal charges, Wikipedia will always tend to go along
with the big corporate media. But that's not where the deep trouble with
Wikipedia lies.
One problem of course is that Wikipedia will tend to ban and
suppress some key information, on the grounds that it is controversial and not
"neutral". The Lords of Wikipedia are "neutral" when they
want to be, at other times they are glad to engage in libel and slander and
fraud, and then they call that "neutral" too.
A real grave danger of Wikipedia - and very obvious evil of
it - comes out with regard to the "U" class of political criminals in
America. These are government or corporate criminals who have political
connections, but are so far Un-indicted, Un-investigated and Un-known to be
criminals, thanks to a cover up by America's mainstream media.
Bush's friend the author Patricia Cornwell, is exactly this
kind of class "U" criminal. People know her name, they know she sells
lots books, but most of the public knows very little about her, despite the
fact that her crimes and scandals and sleazy behavior are nearly all in the
public record. Cornwell funds President Bush and the US politicians with
millions of dollars, has successfully bribed federal judges, and she is good
friends with US government agents, and the reward for her gifts is that the
media won't report on what happens with her. The big corporate media are in
collusion with the US government or Cornwell's publishing company, Pearson -
Penguin, and the small media are afraid they will get nailed by bribed US
judges.
So the media don't talk about how Cornwell and her lesbian
lover Irene Shulgin were frolicking at Kennebunkport with the current President
Bush, and how Cornwell gave the Bush family a $1 million gift then, handing the
money to the President's mother, Barbara Bush (the wife of the previous
President Bush). The media know that story, they have a witness, but they don't
tell. That's because the government wants to deceive all those starry-eyed
Christian voters, who might not have thought so well of Bush or Cornwell,
thinking about that lesbian romping and the money flowing, all on the Bush
family estate.
Contrary to what you might guess about celebrities, the
media will indeed hide many things about celebrities who have good political
connections. If the government is not prosecuting them, and they are truly politically
connected, like Patricia Cornwell, the media will join a cover-up of celebrity
crime.
The public view of reality in the US and is much of the
world is shaped by a small handful of media corporations, whose ownership is
intermixed with the other large multi-national corporations who control much of
the world economy. This control is very effective. Most of the stories you
would want to hear, do not make it onto CNN. You need to dig, and dig deep, on
the internet, to really know what is happening in the world.
And that goes triple for any crimes connected to the US
judges and courts and lawyers. No subject is more taboo in the United States,
than the crooked US legal system: how so many innocent people get sentenced to
prison or have their rights taken away, how people everywhere in America are
robbed and betrayed by judges and lawyers and the system. These topics are all
taboo, very taboo indeed.
The cover-up of America's phony legal system, is one of the
most central Big Lies about the US. That cover-up is a priority for US
intelligence agencies, hence the CIA and other US agency interest in covering
up for Bush's friend Cornwell.
Even in public records, the US is spending about 45 billion
dollars on intelligence and propaganda. That is more than enough to give a
salary to thousands of phoney Wikipedia "volunteers" who are really
employees of the US intelligence agencies.
Given the importance of Wikipedia now as the central tool of
worldwide propaganda, it is simply irresistable to the US rulers to spend this
money on Wikipedia, the most successful government propaganda operation in the
history of the world.
It goes far beyond the desire merely to cover-up for Bush,
though there is plenty of that impulse in the CIA and intelligence agencies,
where the Bushes have held sway ever since George H. W. Bush was CIA Director
several decades ago.
The intelligence agencies know that to maintain the world
image of America as a "democracy", it is important that most people
of the world, and the US citizens who haven't yet been victims, never know the
truth about the crooked and bribed US judges.
The CIA wants to help make sure that people don't think
about the big corporations controlling the courts, and how America's gulag of
2.2 million prisoners is actually the biggest slave labour program since Joe
Stalin and Adolf Hitler. - One out of every 45 working-age US adult males is
already in prison (i.e., not counting children or the elderly), and the US
government and its CIA want to make very sure the world is not thinking too
much about this fact.
And to cover up for the legal system, the CIA and US-Bush
regime need to cover up for Bush's friend Patricia Cornwell. As part of the
2000 election campaign for Bush, Cornwell bought a fake court proceeding with a
US federal judge to ban this writer's freedom of speech. This "show
trial" was so fake it is almost hilarious, with the proof of federal crime
lying around in broad daylight.
The federal judge bribed by Cornwell, Robert Payne, was
appointed by Cornwell's friend the first President Bush. The judge then picked
his own friends to pose as the lawyers of the victim, and as part of the fake
trial they invented a fake "Freedom Works Foundation", a so-called
"first amendment civil rights charity foundation" that did not exist
at all. The judge and his friends put this Cornwell-funded fraud in writing, in
court documents and on the internet.
With this fake trial, they banned this writer's freedom of
speech, thinking they would make him silent about Cornwell and Bush and about
the fake trial. Now, however, they realize they should have killed the writer
instead.
Today, the writer is safe in Europe, a political refugee
from the US government, writing articles like the one you are reading right
now, exposing the fraud of the US legal system.
It is all so important that in 2007, the US regime conducted
another fake trial against Dr Les Sachs, in order to generate corporate media
articles slandering him, and to try and use Google to again ban his writings
from the internet. You are reading one of these US-banned articles right now.
If these crimes were genuinely exposed by an independent
world media (ha!), Patricia Cornwell would be indicted for these crimes
involving US courts and judges, but the US corporate media will side with
Cornwell unless the government moves first. And the government won't move
unless the media moves.
And it's the job of the CIA and Wikipedia, to help try and
make sure the public doesn't know the real truth about Cornwell and her crimes.
The CIA and Wikipedia would like to smear and slander this writer who is
Cornwell's target victim, to try to stop people from reading my words, to try
and prevent me from becoming better known and more effective as a critic of the
corrupt US empire.
The plight of Wikipedia victims
When you get victimized on Wikipedia as a political target
by well-connected crooks, you quickly find out how hard it is to do anything or
contact anybody on Wikipedia, how difficult it is to get any redress. Your
complaints are often just ignored, as they get passed around to the
CIA-type-guys who really control Wikipedia.
And unlike the genteel controversies on Wikipedia, where
they have a dispute between two college professors who are writing about
baroque music, you find they quickly get nasty and venomous and slanderous
about you, if you are a political target like Dr Les Sachs. The Wikipedia goons
do their best to create an image of you as someone who is self-interested, a
rule-breaker, a destructive vandal, someone not using good "Wikiquette".
Meanwhile, the crooks and goons and CIA guys on Wikipedia
all pat each other on the back and congratulate each other, for being fellow
Wikipedia people in good standing.
You can momentarily change the false material they have
written about you, but the Wikipedia goons just change it back, and quickly
start charging you with "vandalising" Wikipedia.
There's all sorts of tricks they use to make it hard for you
to make any complaint. There's a Wikipedia "rule" against threatening
people with legal action. So they allow wealthy criminals to slander you and
tell lies about you, but if you talk about their legal liability - Whoa! They
start to jump in and condemn you, for violating the Wikipedia rule of
mentioning the law.
They even make it hard for you to figure out where to
complain. For a while on Wikipedia, they have had one spot that tells you, if
you've been a victim of libel, to contact the "help desk" - but
there's no link there to the help desk e-mail address, or any clear way to find
it.
When you go to places you think you might make a complaint,
you suddenly find there is a rule posted about how this is the wrong kind of
place, you shouldn't post complaints here - but still no indication of where to
go.
On Wikipedia, when you do make complaints, they basically
end up getting reviewed by the same people who are putting up the false
material about you in the first place. It is just like in the American legal
system, where complaints about judges get smothered by the judges themselves, so
the same judges involved in committing crimes, also get to dismiss your
complaints.
You find that the people on Wikipedia, reflect the power
realities and corruption of American society generally. The Wikipedia
"volunteers", whether they are CIA guys, or regular idiots who are
part of the cult of Wikipedia, or staff members for political criminals like
Patricia Cornwell, all kiss up to the power structure, which they can easily
see by (1) whether you are contacting them yourself, or whether a powerful lawyer
is doing so for you; and (2) what else they can find out about you by googling
your name.
If you are well-connected, rich, powerful, Wikipedia will
instantly adjust things for you. If they feel they can ignore and abuse you,
even the little dumb Wikipedia volunteers tend to follow the lead of the mighty
unseen Lords of Wikipedia, and they will ignore you and sneer with contempt at
you, and even send you e-mails with their abuse and hatred (see more about that
below).
Wikipedia also offers the "Wikipedia advocates"
who are supposed to "represent" you, but these can be guys like W.
Guy Finley of 'Dynascope' - a name similar to other CIA front-company names.
Finley acts like an employee of a CIA-backed intelligence agency contractor,
there to deflect and ignore what you have to say. With regard to complaints
about the libel and slander against Cornwell's biographer on the Patricia
Cornwell page, Finley's response was the laughable suggestion that the victim
try and contact film maker Michael Moore to get the Cornwell scandal exposed
first, before Wikipedia would do anything about the false smears and slanders.
The Wikipedia guy's message was clear - if the big corporate
media will get involved, then Wikipedia will play along. Otherwise, Wikipedia
will continue with false information and slandering, the way the CIA would play
it.
In the Patricia Cornwell page attacking Cornwell's
biographer, they long linked to an "online reference source" for the
Cornwell slandering, a false and deceptive article by a Pace University law
professor, Rosario or also Roy John Girasa, writing under contract for Pearson
- Penguin, Cornwell's own publisher, which has been named in a major court
filing with US judges as a partner in Cornwell's crimes and in the very legal
matter Girasa was describing.
Needless to say, the Wikipedia slandering did not disclose
the conflict of interest in citing this fake Cornwell "source" that
is both Cornwell's publisher, and also a named party along with Cornwell in the
same legal case as is being described.
Wikipedia - a bogus organization and budget
One of the most powerful and dominant media organizations in
the world today, the stated budget and organizational description of Wikipedia
that you find, is laughably preposterous. Really quite absurd.
Like much of America's CIA-backed operations since the
1970s, Wikipedia does its work under the friendly face of a "non-profit
foundation". As you browse the online Wikipedia documents about itself,
you realize how bizarre and unlikely is the picture they are painting for you.
Here is this enormous media organization, with over a
million separate web pages, being accessed constantly and at immense volume
around the world, and printing huge amounts of controversial material which
raise continual legal questions, and having an enormous management apparatus in
place.
But then you see the numbers. Just two full-time employees,
it says in a description of a center node of the Wikipedia empire. Two? Yup,
that's all. There's an annual budget of about one - just one - million dollars.
And much of that for equipment, it says.
What they present for a legal budget, would not even pay for
one lawyer to just read the e-mails about all the legal issues that arise out
of Wikipedia.
There is a tiny board of directors, looking as if it were a
collection of friendly hippie-type personalities. The rest are all
"volunteers".
Yeah, right. "Volunteers" by the thousands,
joining in a very complex management scheme, and somehow this whole giant
worldwide propaganda machine is running, a machine which somehow never seems to
have many expenses except for a few fancy pieces of computer gear.
It seems as if the CIA really over-did it with this
particular fake front of Wikipedia "budget" and
"organization". The storefront is too tiny to really be connected
with the elephantine operation behind it.
Another way that you can see that Wikipedia has government
backing, is that with its officially tiny funding and almost no claimed legal
budget, it really would have been shut down a long time ago for legal expenses.
It's very clear that Wikipedia is a government-backed operation to the highest
degree, or otherwise the judges and lawyers would not be keeping away from it.
But US lawyers "know" the game here - that's why
they don't dare sue Wikipedia to shut it down. They lawyers Wikipedia is backed
by the CIA and the government and the judges. The lawyers know they can end up
quickly disbarred, or with a bullet splattering their brains on the sidewalk,
if they dare to aggressively sue Wikipedia. So the US lawyers stay away, just
like they stay away from any proof of crime by judges.
In fact, Wikipedia is one of those organizations that
deserves to be sued and shut down immediately, it's such a monstrous fraud and
deception today, such an invitation to government mind control in the future.
Who knows the number of people whom it has already slandered and harmed amid
those 1-million-plus CIA-backed Wikipedia web pages.
And it's all right there in Florida where the Bushes can
keep an eye on it.
Even just in general commercial terms, Wikipedia is a
totally illegal monopoly as well as a US-government backed fraud. It's keeping
legitimate providers of information from being more successful, as well as
supporting criminals tied to the US regime. - But US lawyers don't dare to
touch the Wikipedia monster, and the US judges won't let them touch it. It's at
the core of US "national security", the US attempt to be dictator
over the whole world.
Contacting Wikipedia
It's very, very hard to contact Wikipedia, or even to figure
out who to contact or how to contact them. The CIA likes things that way.
Attempts were made to try to talk to Wikipedia for this article, but of course
the Wikipedia people didn't really want to chat about these things - that's not
how CIA guys like to play it.
Here's some contact info for Wikipedia. To start with, an
actual phone number! But press inquiries only, they say. Even when you're doing
journalism about them, though, Wikipedia is likely to not reply to you, unless you
are big corporate media on good terms with US politicians.
High-level Wikipedia administrators who have e-mailed hatred
and abuse to Dr Les Sachs
Two of the very high-level Wikipedia administrators, have
e-mailed to Dr Les Sachs their personal hatred and abuse. These two Wikipedia
administrators are David Gerard, official spokesman for Wikipedia in Great
Britain - the United Kingdom, and W. Guy Finley, a "Wikipedia
Advocate" (a sort of fake Wikipedia "lawyer").
David Gerard and W. Guy Finley have expressed their personal
wishes to do personal malicious harm to Dr Sachs, and to use the worldwide
global media powers of Wikipedia to do so.
Both of these Wikipedia administrators, David Gerard, and W.
Guy Finley, have made clear their full support for the Jew-hating terrorist
crimes of President Bush's friend, the neo-Nazi Patricia Cornwell, and their
support for Patricia Cornwell and Pearson plc operating a media team posing as
"Wikipedia users" to plant false and libellous material against Dr
Les Sachs on Wikipedia.
These Wikipedia administrators who have expressed their
commitment to using Wikipedia to present hostile and libellous planted
"media articles" to attack Dr Sachs, can be reached as follows:
Wikipedia Great Britain - UK spokesman, David Gerard:
dgerard@gmail.com, wp@davidgerard.co.uk
Wikipedia "Advocate" pseudo-lawyer, "W. Guy
Finley":
wgfinley@dynascope.com
(Note the CIA-type front company name, 'Dynascope'.)
Wikipedia Leaders, Press Relations and Other Contacts
Wikipedia press phone number, 'Danny', no last name, at
Wikipedia headquarters in Bush-regime Florida:
+1 727 231 0101
Wikipedia "Founder", James "Jimbo"
(Jimmy Jim) Wales:
jwales@wikimedia.org, jwales@wikia.com
Legal contact:
"Dan Rosenthal - Wikimedia Foundation" <legal-en@wikimedia.org>,
Wikipedia press and leadership contacts:
press@wikimedia.org, dgerard@gmail.com,
wp@davidgerard.co.uk, fdevouard@wikimedia.org, abeesley@wikimedia.org,
mindspillage@gmail.com, mapellegrini@comcast.net, nicholasmoreau@gmail.com, walter@wikipedia.be,
timo.jyrinki@hut.fi, joonas.lyytinen@ri.fi, press-fr@wikimedia.org,
press-de@wikimedia.org, ubifrieda@gmail.com, chris.nyborg@online.no, dariusz.siedlecki@wikimedia.pl,
matshalldin@gmail.com, press@wikimedia.ch, jdforrester@gmail.com
Wikipedia "Advocate" pseudo-lawyer, W. Guy Finley:
wgfinley@dynascope.com
Other Wikipedia e-mail addresses that will also likely
ignore you unless you are powerful and have good political or media
connections:
Wikipedia libel "help desk" (ha!):
helpdesk-l@wikimedia.org
Wikimedia "support" team:
info-en-u@wikimedia.org
Wikipedia "information" team:
info-en@wikimedia.org
Wikipedia ignore-you-even-more team:
info-en-q@wikimedia.org
In a recent newsletter of the well-known Barry Chamish, he
gives the following address and phone numbers for contacting the Lords of
Wikipedia. Barry Chamish writes:
"Thank you Mr. Stockmann who traced down Wikipedia's
address for all of us. If you don't like my lying report or anybody's, and the
inability to change it, call:
No comments:
Post a Comment